Don’t drop out, Dean
Politics 02/07/2004 |Well, it looks like it’s official — Kerry has taken both Washington and Michigan, with Dean in second place.
What worries me the most about this is that it will be spun into Dean’s death knell (for instance, the Seattle PI’s story headlined “Kerry whips Dean in Washington”). Even Dean has been saying that without a win in Wisconsin, he’ll likely be dropping out of the race. Personally, I’d see this as a real shame.
It’s fairly widely recognized by many people, even if they’re not Dean supporters, that many of the issues being brought up in all of the campaigns were initially brought up by Dean. If he had not started asking many of the questions that all of the candidates are now asking, we could be facing a very different campaign season (and quite possibly one with far less of a chance of ousting Bush from office).
Personally, I’d love to see Dean stay in the race even if he doesn’t pick up Wisconsin. Even if he can’t get the money to campaign the way he has been, I think it would be great if he could do essentially what Sharpton has been doing the entire time — don’t worry about spending the thousands and millions of dollars on high-profile ads and television spots. Instead, just doggedly hang in there, show up for the debates, and make sure that his voice gets heard and that the questions that need to be asked are asked and don’t get brushed under the carpet.
It’s all too easy for me to see Dean call things to a halt after a loss in Wisconsin, and suddenly have Kerry revert to being “just another politician”. Much of the reason I’ve been (and am) a Dean supporter had nothing to do with “electability”, but was entirely because he struck me very much as someone who actually wanted to make a change for the better, and wasn’t going to be bothered with beating around the bush or pandering to special interests merely to get into office. Kerry has never made an impression on be other than being yet another politician.
It feels like Kerry wants to be President so he can be President, while Dean wants to be President so that he can make a difference.
Sharpton doesn’t stand a chance of getting the nomination, but he’s still in the race. Edwards and Clark have worse numbers than Dean, but they’re still in the race. Heck, Kucinich has fewer confirmed delegates than Sharpton does, and he hasn’t dropped out yet! As long as Dean is in one of the top three spots (and he’s currently in second, though few media reports are likely to point that out), I think he should stick it out — scale back operations if necessary, but don’t disappear. Don’t let Kerry slide back into old habits. Keep being the prickly burr under the saddle that’s keeping the rest of the delegates on their toes.
I really think that the two biggest factors driving the record turnout of voters in the current caucus/primary season have been Bush’s incompetence and Dean’s dogged determinism in speaking the truth, not mincing words, and doing the best he can. I’d hate to see that element disappear just because the media has dubbed him “unelectable”.
iTunes: “Soul Crying Out” by Simple Minds from the album Street Fighting Years (1989, 6:07).
[See also: Dean ‘near-perfect’ in latest debate | Look out, Bush | Dean leads in California | Can Bush do anything but lie? | Dean calls for Bush accountability ]
« Caucus Time | Geek backlash »
6 Responses to “Don’t drop out, Dean”
Leave a Reply






February 8th, 2004 at 6:21 am
Keep on fighting
I don’t think Howard Dean has much of a chance of getting the nomination now, unfortunately. We’re in a situation where the sole reason for voting for someone has become
February 8th, 2004 at 6:39 pm
Michael,
Why would it be a waste? If he devides the party wouldn’t that cause more harm?
I’ve heard that he wouldn’t even accept a vice-president ticket. Any thoughts on that?
February 8th, 2004 at 6:49 pm
I don’t see it being a Nader-style division of votes, simply because what I’m proposing (hoping for) is simply for Dean to stay in the race for the Democratic nomination as long as he can. Once the DNC rolls around and the official nomination is presented, then if Dean doesn’t get it, he would then graciously concede defeat (on the other hand, if he does get it, so much the better). I certainly wouldn’t want him (or any other candidate) sticking around after the nomination process is over and running a third-party/independent campaign, for all the same reasons that I don’t like the idea of Nader running again this year.
I’d be a bit disappointed if Dean has entirely ruled out a VP spot. Now, if Kerry gets the nomination, I doubt there’s much chance at all of him offering Dean the VP position (there’s been a bit too much sniping between the two camps for me to see that happening), but should Kerry have the balls to do just that, I think it could be a very interesting combination — in an odd way, similar to the Bush/Cheney combination (a politician teamed with a bulldog, so to speak). Only better. Much better.
February 9th, 2004 at 4:36 am
Isn’t second place something of an improvement for Dean after the last few primaries? I hope he stays in the race too. If nothing else, he’s really helped unify and energize the party’s base, and the Dems should at least thank him for that. He’s also managed to change and focus the Democratic message. He was one of the few who was willing to criticiase Bush when the rest of the Democrats were still trying to remember that that they had a pair. Now many of them are co-opting the message Dean was spouting from the beginning of his campaign.
I don’t know about a VP spot for Dean, though. It seems to me something he just wouldn’t do.
Ditto on Nader running this year.
February 9th, 2004 at 12:41 pm
I’m a big dean supporter. But, I don’t totally agree with you about him staying in the race. Wisconsin is a good spot to draw a line in the sand. If he can’t win there… it’s doubtful that he’ll do well either Super Tuesday. It looks like Kerry will be the nominee. I’ve been with Dean since early last spring and have given $ to his campaign (first time I’ve ever done that)… but, what dean wants and what I think all Democrats want to see is Bush out of office. And Kerry has been deemed (whether correct or not) the candidate with the best chance. Kerry is a safe choice to combat Bush. Dean would satisfy my needs the best. But, the country seems satisfied with something “less powerful” but more “sure and safe”.
After Bush’s interview yesterday, I think Kerry has a great chance. As for VP… there is no doubt who that will go to — Edwards. ANd that may be also a good safe choice, since he will play well in the south.
It all should make for a very interesting summer! And one that The Daily Show with John Stewart should have fun with!
February 10th, 2004 at 2:19 pm
My main comment is on this quote from your post,
“It’s fairly widely recognized by many people, even if they’re not Dean supporters, that many of the issues being brought up in all of the campaigns were initially brought up by Dean. If he had not started asking many of the questions that all of the candidates are now asking, we could be facing a very different campaign season.
While I agree that Dean has a tremendous effect on the campaign, I think that it is Kucinich who has brought these questions to the forefront of the discourse. Kucinich is the only true peace canidate. Dean has supported military action in the past, if not for Kucinich would the other Demicrats be throwing so much egg toward the White House on the war issue? Kerry waffeled on the current war, Dean did not vote, Clark was a fool in Bosina, nearly leading to a war with Russia.
As you can most likely tell, I am a diehard Kucinich supporter. It irks me to no end that the once faceless Dean has taken many ideas from many canidates and claimed them as his own. Kucinich was first with the grass roots effort, Kucinich was first in being against the war in Iraq and the travesties of the Department of Justice.
Yeah, a little raw and unformulated, but what can you expect when a perfectly good canidate is sidelined for the entire election process and the big guy (Dean) takes on his views, calls them his own, is labeled a progressive, looses primaries, and is then sidelined, and spun out of the contest by the media.
The media wants what is best for them, which for the Dems is Kerry. They will spin coverage of Kerry so that it seems he is truly the opposite of Herr Bush, Kerry will get the nomination. The press will spin a victory for Bush (it is not liberal by any means, as you know). And we will be up a dirty creek with out a paddle for four more years.