An insider’s view of MS Word 6.0
Technology 02/27/2004 |Microsoft Word for the Mac versions 4 and 5 were my introductions to Word, and in the opinion of myself and many other people, were the pinnacle of Microsoft’s Mac programming.
I had a single 1.4Mb floppy disc on my first Mac (a Mac Classic) that had the MS Word program and every paper I wrote for school that year, and it ran quite happily in the 1Mb of RAM that my lil’ Classic had in it. Word 5, while not that small, was the perfect combination of features and usability, adding useful functions without becoming too much of a memory, space, or speed hog.
Then came Word 6.
Huge. Bloated. A memory hog. Dog-slow. And a truly hideous interface that only a Windows user could love (or even feel at home in).
Things have improved since then, thankfully — Word (and Office) for Mac OS X is actually useable, though I tend not to bother unless I have a really pressing need (such as getting into old archived documents laying around on my system), as the majority of my writing these days is either coding my site in BBEdit or posting via Ecto.
Still, it was quite interesting to find this look at the creation of MS Word 6 from Rick Schaut, one of the people on the team for Word 6.
Shipping a crappy product is a lot like beating your head against the wall. It really does feel good when you ship a great product as a follow-up, and it really does motivate you to spend some time trying to figure out how not to ship a crappy product again.
Mac Word 6.0 was a crappy product. And, we spent some time trying to figure out how not to do that again. In the process, we learned a few things, not the least of which was the meaning of the term “Mac-like.”
<
p>(via Scoble)
iTunes: “Homey Don’t Play Dat” by Bonnie ‘n’ Clyde from the album Terminator X and the Valley of the Jeep Beats (1991, 4:12).
[See also: Antici… | What do you write about? | Why blog? | Talk about geek heaven! | What Al said, in tiny bits. ]
7 Responses to “An insider’s view of MS Word 6.0”
Leave a Reply






February 27th, 2004 at 5:09 am
A PeeCee user for 12 years, I’ve never intensively used a Mac upto now (and probably won’t till I get rich… find a full-time job, that is), but I had just one off-topic question: Why do Mac users love BBEdit so darn much? I mean, I use Topstyle and Metapad as my editors. There’s color coding, CSS, XHTML, JavaScript support, FTP-ing, etc (on TopStyle)… BBEdit struck me to be too… plain.
Whats so great about it? Besides the fact that it’s pleasurably light-weight and has many handy features? Why use it so much for web development and proudly state “This site was hand-coded in BBEdit”? Why do Mac users do that so much?
(It also could be that it might have the CSS, blah, blah support and I might have missed it. I’m sorry if that’s the case!)
February 27th, 2004 at 7:15 am
I hate word. hate it. I was told when I made the switch that in order to exchance information with other users, I would have to use microsoft office suite. So I used word to write my papers, protocols, and started my thesis in word. I have an older ibook and thus a lot of ipods have more muscle than my computer, but word is the only program that consistantly gives me problems. I can even run photoshop without having problems with my machine locking up, but word causes all sorts of problems. Upgrading to OSX and newer versions helped, but didn’t eliminate the problem. So I switched to appleworks and love it. Not only does it not cause me to need to restart every 30 minutes, but it is a more powerful word processing program than word. I can do all sorts of things that just couldn’t be done in word. I haven’t tried any other word processing programs to compare it with, but compared to word, appleworks rocks. Now, if only it would work with a good reference program like endnote, my life would be grand.
February 27th, 2004 at 9:59 am
We love BBEdit for pretty much all of those reasons, actually. Admittedly, I’ve not used Topstyle or Metapad, so I can’t do a true feature comparison, but everything you listed is built into BBEdit. Feel free to check out this BBEdit Feature List or these screenshots to get a bit more of an idea of BBEdit’s capabilities.
(Disclaimer: while the rest has a certain amount of seriousness to it, it was also written somewhat tongue-in-cheek. Picture it being said with a mischievous grin and a glint in the eye…)
Also, though, I think it’s something of a matter of pride. As Mac users in a primarily Windows world, we’ve historically been sneered and snickered at because we don’t use “real computers” (i.e., instead of a command line, we have pretty pictures to click on) — while this is becoming less of an issue with the rise of both XP (pretty pictures!) and Mac OS X (a unix command line!), it’s still a popular opinion — if I had a penny for every time someone has made a snide comment about me being a Mac user…well, I’d have a good few dollars, at least.
In an atmosphere such as that, it’s nice to be able to open up a “bare bones” text editor, start typing away, and create a site from scratch, while at the same time watching many of our PC-using brethren struggle with FrontPage only to take longer to come up with an uglier page that contains a lot of bloated, redundant, and unnecessary code.
It’s our little way of saying, “Hey, piss off — we really do know what we’re doing after all!”
February 28th, 2004 at 12:06 am
I did so love Word 5.0. Then the honeymoon was over and Word 6.0 with its macro virii came a callin’.
September 12th, 2004 at 10:05 am
hi am lookin g for ms word 6.0 for mac anyone has it still
Marco
February 1st, 2005 at 10:00 pm
The usability month
Wes Meltzer is pining for some reader response—anything to break up the onslaught of spam he receives. As fodder for some comments, this month’s Mac blogosphere scouring has turned up a lot of discussion about Microsoft Word’s downward spiral that star…
December 18th, 2005 at 3:47 pm
I have ms word 6.0 & 6.01 for mac if any one is interested - make an offer