Marriage by the Book, part 2
Religion, Weblogs 03/21/2004 |Something I pointed out last August seems to be making the rounds again, and now I’m a bit curious as to the original source. It’s a collection of proposed laws for governing marriage, based on Biblical quotations (in response to the many people basing their anti-gay-marriage stance on select Biblical verses, instead of just admitting to homophobia and bigotry).
Here’s what I know of this piece of writing, working backwards.
Today — March 21st, 2004 — Boing Boing posted about it, linking to The Common Good Network, who posted their version on February 4th, 2004.
The Common Good Network gave attribution to The Boston Phoenix, who published a more Massacheussets-specific version of the text between Nov. 28th and Dec. 4th, 2003 under the byline of Mary-Ann Greanier.
However, searching through my archives, I linked to and quoted nearly the identical text on August 26th, 2003, after discovering it through the Ex-Gay Watch via a link from Anil Dash, and linked to the original version (to my knowledge) on Public Nuisance from August 18th, 2003.
While I’m sure that Alex Frantz of Public Nuisance is flattered that his creation is still making the rounds, shouldn’t credit be given where credit is due?
[See also: Marriage ‘by The Book’ | Is Boing Boing broken? | Rush Job | Working out the bugs | Meme Propagation Test ]
« Congratulations Rev. Dammann! | Kevin Smith on ‘The Passion’ »
3 Responses to “Marriage by the Book, part 2”
Leave a Reply






March 21st, 2004 at 5:31 pm
Hanscome Traces Marriage by the Book
Michael Hanscome of Eclecticism traces the widely linked and reposted Marriage by the Book. A demonstration of how original authors and attributions can get lost on the web. Original author seems to be Alex Frantz.
March 22nd, 2004 at 8:40 am
Wooo, thanks for pointing that one out. Gave me an opening to post up a new rant.
March 22nd, 2004 at 8:47 am
Base marriage laws on the bible!
Since this is my first time seeing it, I’m going to post it. A rather poignant look at what marriage laws would be if they were based on biblical principles. It’s from last August, but Michael over at Eclecticism mentioned it.
I hate when …