The Heirophant’s Proselytizer Questionnaire
Links, Religion 04/03/2004 |Ellenoir pointed out a fascinating page that I’d not seen before: The Heirophant’s Proselytizer Questionnaire, one person’s response to being constantly harassed by missionaries of one faith or another trying to “save” or “convert” him.
The Heirophant’s Proselytizer Questionnaire is a series of offensively phrased questions that explain my problems with and objections to the various Christian churches. I originally wrote it in 1997 as a tool that I handed out to the too-numerous proselytes who were crowding at my door, explaining that I would consider entering into a dialogue with them if and only if they could answer each and every question to my satisfaction. …Though I have received numerous responses to the Questionnaire since I wrote it, none has satisfied me enough to tempt me back to Christianity.
The questionnaire itself is a list of 153 questions for the proselytizer to answer before discussion can continue. The author admits in the FAQ that the questions are written in a very aggressive, possibly offensive style…
…It’s meant to be really offensive. If you look at the reasons why I composed it in the first place, you’ll see that my primary motivation was, quite simply, to get proselytes to fuck off when they wouldn’t do so any other way. By setting a condition for them to fulfill before I’d engage in a dialogue with them and by making the condition more trouble than it was worth to most of them, I wound up able to sleep later in the mornings than I’d been able to when I had a constant stream of preachers on my doorstep. Ensuring that the phrasing of the Questionnaire was confrontational and offensive was an integral part of the process of getting people who had essentially nothing to say to me to leave me alone.
As someone brought up in the Episcopal church who still bases many of my core beliefs in the Christian faith (though I’ve certainly had my fair share of questions, concerns, and doubts over the years), I thought the idea was wonderful — and have no problem at all admitting that I would be very hard pressed to answer many (if not most) of the questions posed.
On a personal level, I stand very much in the same camp as the author (along with Ellenoir, too, from what she said in her post): believe anything you want, just don’t try to force your beliefs on me, convince me that you’re “right” and I’m “wrong”, or attempt to frighten me into joining your religion through threats of hellfire and damnation.
This document is not meant as a personal challenge to you or to your beliefs. As far as I’m concerned, you can worship Jesus or be a Buddhist or a Muslim or have sex with Tinky Winky and call that a religion: It’s all the same to me. Really. The HPQ was meant to state my own reasons why I’m not a Christian; it’s not meant to imply that you shouldn’t be one. (There’s a big difference between the two, and many Christians would do well to learn it.) Be a member of whatever religion you want; just leave me alone and don’t push it on me. I’m not knocking on your door asking you to be a Wiccan or a Buddhist or a Satanist or an atheist or a Muslim or anything else that you’re not; all that I ask is that you extend me the same courtesy.
iTunes: “Blasphemous Rumours” by Depeche Mode from the album Blasphemous Rumours (1984, 6:23).
[See also: National Day of Prayer | Which religion? | Belief, faith, and the church | Narnia and Christianity — does it matter? | Political compass ]
One Response to “The Heirophant’s Proselytizer Questionnaire”
Leave a Reply






April 3rd, 2004 at 8:19 pm
It’s a fascinating list of questions, well documented and self-referential. However, it assumes a “western” faith base and doesn’t give much opportunity for the Hindus, Budhists, Shentoists, Taoists, or followers of any of the other thousands of religions. As far as I can tell, they’re all a bunch of hokem and rely far too much on humanity’s apparently fatal flaw - our collective and complete lack of self worth and self creation.
Why would we want to follow someone else’s idea of a reason? Because we have no clue ourselves. That just tells me that most of the world is filled with individuals who have a great emptiness in their soul - pity them. As far as I’m concerned, we’re here because of the laws of physics - how those laws came into being is yet another question we can’t answer but at least it’s got some path to finding an answer. Far more than most religions offer.
Does this mean I’m amoral and unethical. Hardly, I have strong morals and ethics but I don’t light candles to keep them alive and I don’t need someone else’s poetry to tell me how magnificent this planet is or how valuable life is. I can deduce that for myself. It does give new light to the meaning of “clueless society,” though.
BTW, I’m completely down on any organized religion or faith, that’s a known fact, so no flames please.