MovableType 3: License updates and clarifications
MovableType 05/15/2004 |Funny the difference a day or so can make — and never let it be said that people (or corporations) can’t learn from their mistakes. Six Apart has posted updates and clarifications to their licensing options that make things look much more reasonable.
Briefly, the key points that I was concerned about…
The single-CPU limitation nonsense:
The single CPU usage statement was not intended to be in the license. It has been struck from the license, and everyone who has downloaded Movable Type 3.0 thus far can officially consider this change retroactive.
Admittedly, I’m very curious about this one. If it wasn’t intended to be in the license, how did it get in there in the first place? And then stay there up to the point where it was posted to the website? Didn’t anyone (their lawyers, for example) go over this stuff with a fine-toothed comb first? This is the sole point that still really has my eyebrows raised.
The number of weblogs or authors in an installation:
Firstly, they’ve changed a few of the licensing options a tad, and added the ability to purchase “add-on” weblogs to a license for ten dollars (for instance, if your license specified five weblogs, you can buy the rights to run a sixth).
Secondly, and far more importantly, they’ve clarified what is considered a single weblog — essentially, the wording might be better if it was called a website rather than a weblog.
The question of what a “weblog” is is somewhat muddy, but the basic answer to the first question is that, if you’re using multiple “Weblogs” in Movable Type in order to build 1 site, that only counts as 1 weblog towards the license limits.
In our licenses, we now address this with this language: “Weblog” means a single Web site viewable at a single URL (Uniform Resource Locator), consisting of one or more weblogs as generated by the Software via the “Create New Weblog” function of the Software. To be clear, sub-weblogs that make up weblog sites shouldn’t be counted toward your weblog total.
<
p>This is excellent to hear, and should alleviate the concerns of many (if not most) of the people who, like me, found the licensing scheme overly restrictive.
That said, I’m still curious about some of the other options out there, and will continue to investigate them, but at least I don’t feel nearly as concerned about potentially moving my personal webserver to MT 3 at some later date if I decide to take that path.
[See also: Two Dave Winer grumbles | Why I won’t be upgrading to MT 3.0 | MovableType 3.0: Ouch | I hate it when I’m stupid | Protect the Baby Squirrels ]
« Why I won’t be upgrading to MT 3.0 | Protect the Baby Squirrels »
6 Responses to “MovableType 3: License updates and clarifications”
Leave a Reply






May 15th, 2004 at 5:34 am
RE: The single-CPU limitation nonsense
I don’t know how specifically that 1 CPU clause made it in there, but I can take a guess having been a participant of numerous corprorate legal and licensing negoiations.
Most contract begin from a standard document or a collection of standard clauses. They are rarely written from scratch. (I’ve never heard of license text being copyrighted. That would be silly.) So its highly possible that the base document was written for a piece of software were a single CPU license made sense. Most software company selling products that run on servers cap them by the CPU.
How does it get missed? A lawyer probably doesn’t know what a CPU is or how shared hosting works. In the heat of the moment of a software/project release, those who do are usually preoccupied with other things (like fixing bugs and writing documentation) that they don’t get to go over it with a fine tooth comb and little things get missed. Its happened to me personally on a few occasions.
So there is no conspiracy as some always seem to suggest.
May 15th, 2004 at 8:54 am
I upgraded to 3.0
Wow, I was talking with OJ, when we decided to see if Movabletype had released 3.0. O yes! You see those prices and ish? LOL. They are ridiculous, I think they deserve to make profit off of it, somewhat…
May 15th, 2004 at 9:21 am
lol, oops, sorry about the multi pings.
May 15th, 2004 at 11:59 am
Arie — no worries, they’re deleted.
Tim — to a certain extent that makes sense (at least as far as how it got in there in the first place), but I still find it very surprising that it was never noticed before being posted for the world to see. I think “conspiracy” is more than a little harsh for questioning that, though.
February 5th, 2005 at 1:37 am
Hi, I was searching for CPU Usage in MT 3.XX and I found this site. Right now I have MT 2.661 and my hosting company is saying that my CPU usage is ALOT! I wanted to ask you about this because you’re using it already. Do you know how is the CPU Usage in MT 3.XX?
If you can PLZ email me.
Thanks.
February 5th, 2005 at 8:47 am
I’ve e-mailed this also, but just in case anyone comes across Leo’s question on a Google search:
There was a major bug uncovered in all versions of Movable Type prior to 3.14 a couple of months ago.
Here’s the post from the Movable Type crew.
In brief, though, what’s going on is that when a MT site comes under attack from a comment spammer (which is happening more and more often these days), even if you have some form of spam blocker such as Jay Allen’s MT Blacklist installed, each spam attempt is causing your installation of MT to do a complete rebuild. This will happen even if the spams are being blocked. Because the spammers use scripts that are capable of sending hundreds or even thousands of spam attacks every minute, this causes MT’s CPU useage to skyrocket, as it is constantly rebuilding the entire website.
This bug has been fixed as of MT 3.14, and it is strongly recommended that you (and any other MT users that your hosting provider has on their servers) upgrade as soon as possible (the current version of MT is now 3.15). If you run a single weblog that you are the only author on, the base level of MT 3.x is still free for personal use.
There have been a lot of other improvements with MT 3.x, too, so I think you’ll find it worth the time to upgrade. I’d also recommend going over the Six Apart Guide to Comment Spam and seeing how many of the recommendations in that guide you are comfortable with implementing on your site. I’ve ended up installing MT Blacklist, turning on TypeKey moderation, and renaming the MT comment script, and those three steps have drastically reduced the amount of comment spam I have to deal with.
In any case, good luck with the upgrade, and hopefully this will help keep your hosting provider from grumbling at you anymore.