Terror in whose eyes?
Current Affairs 07/23/2004 |Over the past week, there’s been no small amount of online uproar over the story of one woman’s account of what she felt was a ‘dry run’ for another terrorist attack. The article, Terror in the Skies, Again? (and its follow-up Part II), has been linked to on hundreds of websites, e-mailed from one person to another, and generally spreading nearly as fast as the latest Internet Explorer exploit.
I’d seen and read the article, of course, but after reading it, I made the decision not to mention it here. As I read Annie Jacobsen’s “terrifying account” of a flight wherein nothing happened, it felt to me like little more than hysterical and possibly racist paranoia. Over the week, while it was gratifying to see others who read the article as I did (in this MetaFilter discussion, for instance, or this article in Salon), not surprisingly, those voices didn’t get nearly as much press.
Now, though, enough furor has been raised over the article that according to Eric Leonard of KFI News, air marshalls that were on board the flight have found it necessary to step forward and give their own assessment of the situation. There’s apparently no permalink to the article (bad news site! no cookie!), so here’s a copy:
LOS ANGELES | July 22, 2004 – Undercover federal air marshals on board a June 29 Northwest airlines flight from Detroit to LAX identified themselves after a passenger, “overreacted,” to a group of middle-eastern men on board, federal officials and sources have told KFI NEWS.
The passenger, later identified as Annie Jacobsen, was in danger of panicking other passengers and creating a larger problem on the plane, according to a source close to the secretive federal protective service. Jacobsen, a self-described freelance writer, has published two stories about her experience at womenswallstreet.com, a business advice web site designed for women. “The lady was overreacting,” said the source. “A flight attendant was told to tell the passenger to calm down; that there were air marshals on the plane.” The middle eastern men were identified by federal agents as a group of touring musicians travelling to a concert date at a casino, said Air Marshals spokesman Dave Adams.
Jacobsen wrote she became alarmed when the men made frequent trips to the lavatory, repeatedly opened and closed the overhead luggage compartments, and appeared to be signaling each other.
“Initially it was brought to [the air marshals] attention by a passenger,” Adams said, adding the agents had been watching the men and chose to stay undercover. Jacobsen and her husband had a number of conversations with the flight attendants and gestured towards the men several times, the source said. “In concert with the flight crew, the decision was made to keep [the men] under surveillance since no terrorist or criminal acts were being perpetrated aboard the aircraft; they didn’t interfere with the flight crew,” Adams said. The air marshals did, however, check the bathrooms after the middle-eastern men had spent time inside, Adams said. FBI agents met the plane when it landed in Los Angeles and the men were questioned, and Los Angeles field office spokeswoman Cathy Viray said it’s significant the alarm on the flight came from a passenger. “We have to take all calls seriously, but the passenger was worried, not the flight crew or the federal air marshals,” she said. “The complaint did not stem from the flight crew.” Several people were questioned, she said, but no one was detained. Jacobsen’s husband Kevin told KFI NEWS he approached a man he thought was an air marshal after the flight had landed. “You made me nervous,” Kevin said the air marshal told him. “I was freaking out,” Kevin replied. “We don’t freak out in situations like this,” the air marshal responded. Federal agents later verified the musicians’ story. “We followed up with the casino,” Adams said. A supervisor verified they were playing a concert. A second federal law enforcement source said the concert itself was monitored by an agent. “We also went to the hotel, determined they had checked into the hotel,” Adams said. Each of the men were checked through a series of databases and watch-lists with negative results, he said. The source said the air marshals on the flight were partially concerned Jacobsen’s actions could have been an effort by terrorists or attackers to create a disturbance on the plane to force the agents to identify themselves. Air marshals’ only tactical advantage on a flight is their anonymity, the source said, and Jacobsen could have put the entire flight in danger. “They have to be very cognizant of their surroundings,” spokesman Adams confirmed, “to make sure it isn’t a ruse to try and pull them out of their cover.” KFI reporter Jessica Rosenthal contributed to this report. Copyright 2004 KFI NEWS. All rights reserved.
<
p>(via Atrios)
[See also: Derailing the Peace Train | We are all suspects | Going down | The stuff of nightmares | Back in Anchorage ]
9 Responses to “Terror in whose eyes?”
Leave a Reply






July 23rd, 2004 at 11:50 pm
I first noticed this when I decided to glance at the National Review’s “The Corner” group weblog thing.. (not linking there, ‘twas July 17 in their archives), and one of the morons was like: “My reaction to the whole thing: Why on earth are we letting Syrians into the U.S.A.? Syria is a terrorist-friendly state.”
How do you become a paid writer without a scrap of empathy? I’d bet anything that there are Syrians who wonder why the Muslim-world invading Americans are let into their country.
July 24th, 2004 at 3:04 am
What I find disturbing is the fact that it apparently is illegal for a police officer to pull your car over without a clear reason, but it is allowed to detain, question, do extensive background checks and shadow a person for several days on the basis of 1 person panicking because they opened the overhead baggage compartment once too often.
With that logic I should have been handcuffed and escorted out of the plane the last time I traveled. I must have stood op and pulled stuff out of my hand luggage 10 times during the first hour on the plane… once even dropped a heavy bag on the head of someone sitting right below it. (Sorry ‘bout that)… luckily I got one thing going for me… clear white western-european skin… ahhh, the best commodity one can have these days.
July 24th, 2004 at 6:18 am
Frightening - but I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry at the comment about “why couldn’t terrorists learn to play musical instruments?” Priceless.
Basically, this woman is saying all Middle Easterners should be thoroughly searched before being allowed to fly, and implying they shouldn’t be allowed to fly in groups. The woman is a xenophobe. In the UK, publishing this article could have landed her, and the site that hosted it, 7 years in jail - and quite right too. It’s partly because of attitudes like this that some parts of the world have a problem with America and her allies. I am more scared by this mad woman than the threat of terrorist attack.
July 24th, 2004 at 6:20 am
Frightening - but I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry at the comment about “why couldn’t terrorists learn to play musical instruments?” Priceless.
Basically, this woman is saying all Middle Easterners should be thoroughly searched before being allowed to fly, and implying they shouldn’t be allowed to fly in groups. The woman is a xenophobe. In the UK, publishing this article could have landed her, and the site that hosted it, 7 years in jail - and quite right too. It’s partly because of attitudes like this that some parts of the world have a problem with America and her allies. I am more scared by this mad woman than the threat of terrorist attack.
July 24th, 2004 at 11:19 am
I don’t think that article should warrant any jail time. There’s enough thought/speech policing going on as it is.
Personally, I’d find it a little disturbing if they didn’t check up on them after the flight. God knows if I so much as have my cellphone or iPod out during take-off or landing the stewardess acts like its a freaking RPG.
July 25th, 2004 at 1:43 pm
I’ve written a parody of Jacobsen’s article (see link).
One interesting note about this entire affair - the Federal agents performed all sorts of checks, but apparently didn’t realize until after the fact that all of the musicians’ visas had expired. That little piece of information worries me more than all of the bathroom visits and McDonalds meals put together.
July 26th, 2004 at 8:08 am
Not all Muslims are terrorist, but most of the terrorists are Muslims, and all the 9/11 terrorist were from the middle east. So, yes middle east Muslim men between the age of 20 to 40 should be profiled as potential terrorist, not someones grandma, or an 8 year old boy. If all those people yelling about profiling would read the patriot act and put that misplaced anger where it belongs we as a nation might get somewhere.
July 26th, 2004 at 11:52 am
I read through the whole thing and lets just say any article that starts with a note that the author is not sure that you can have safety and civil liberties at the same time…. well, I start to get suspicious. The writing was good, and sensationalistic. I admit, I got a little freaked out, at least until she quoted Coulter. After that I re-thought things and then read the follow up pieces, I determined that the author is a nutter
I’m glad that Bush has managed to convince at least some of the people that they NEED to give up their rights to be safe. She wanted to have her newspaper folds, and sons backpack searched again before bording the plane! Yea, that sounds like fun. I’ll let her be the first to enjoy that loss of freedom.
Go Canada!
July 26th, 2004 at 5:01 pm
One “dude” once said… “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759). That kinda sums it up doesn’t it?
I live in a small town and when I was a little kid (must have been no older then 10) I used to visit my old kindergarden teacher. She had an adopted son who came from Africa and had the blackest skin you could imagine, he had been with the family from right after he was born… Every Saturday he would go out (17years old at the time) and almost every time he would be pulled over by the same cop asking him for his ID. After the ninth time he had enough and politely refused to show his ID and spent the night in jail. Hearing that story made such an impression on me….
So it makes me mad that people are considered (with great probability) to be terrorist just because they are aged 20 to 40 and have a middle eastern appearance. And yes let me be a realist and say that not ALL 20 to 40 year men from the Middle East are terrorists…
Do you remember Timothy McVeigh? What would your opinion be if after the Oklahoma City bombing, every white male aged 18 to 26 was questioned every time he entered a public building, have his financial records checked and his car shadowed because it was statistically very likely he was a terrorist BECAUSE he was white and aged 18 to 26? 8 or so out of 10 times a serial killer (in the “Profiler” sense of the word) is an adult white male from a very strict Catholic background… yet not all Catholics are being tailed… Why is that?
I’m all for safety and being careful (Wear a condom people!!!) but you won’t be safe from terrorist by picking up every dude who fits in the demographic of the 9/11 pilots, because then the next time the pilot will be a female aged 50. That’s how terrorism works. You need to find out WHY they hate the US and change it. But as with my black neighbor’s cop… you won’t make new friends by first treating them all as criminals.