Recently, a letter from Wall Street Journal reporter Farnaz Fassihi started getting passed around the ‘net, detailing just what day-to-day life in Iraq is like at the moment. That letter has now been confirmed as genuine.
Readers of any nailbiting story from Iraq in a major mainstream newspaper must often wonder what the dispassionate reporter really thinks about the chaotic situation there, and what he or she might be saying in private letters or in conversations with friends back home.
Now, at least in the case of Wall Street Journal correspondent Farnaz Fassihi, we know. A lengthy letter from Baghdad she recently sent to friends “has rapidly become a global chain mail,” Fassihi told Jim Romenesko on Wednesday after it was finally posted at the Poynter Institute’s Web site. She confirmed writing the letter. “Iraqis say that thanks to America they got freedom in exchange for insecurity,” Fassihi wrote (among much else) in the letter. “Guess what? They say they’d take security over freedom any day, even if it means having a dictator ruler.” And: “Despite President Bush’s rosy assessments, Iraq remains a disaster. If under Saddam it was a ‘potential’ threat, under the Americans it has been transformed to ‘imminent and active threat,’ a foreign policy failure bound to haunt the United States for decades to come.”
Read on for the full text of Fassihi’s letter…
Being a foreign correspondent in Baghdad these days is like being under virtual house arrest. Forget about the reasons that lured me to this job: a chance to see the world, explore the exotic, meet new people in far away lands, discover their ways and tell stories that could make a difference.
Little by little, day-by-day, being based in Iraq has defied all those reasons. I am house bound. I leave when I have a very good reason to and a scheduled interview. I avoid going to people’s homes and never walk in the streets. I can’t go grocery shopping any more, can’t eat in restaurants, can’t strike a conversation with strangers, can’t look for stories, can’t drive in any thing but a full armored car, can’t go to scenes of breaking news stories, can’t be stuck in traffic, can’t speak English outside, can’t take a road trip, can’t say I’m an American, can’t linger at checkpoints, can’t be curious about what people are saying, doing, feeling. And can’t and can’t. There has been one too many close calls, including a car bomb so near our house that it blew out all the windows. So now my most pressing concern every day is not to write a kick-ass story but to stay alive and make sure our Iraqi employees stay alive. In Baghdad I am a security personnel first, a reporter second. It’s hard to pinpoint when the turning point exactly began. Was it April when the Fallujah fell out of the grasp of the Americans? Was it when Moqtada and Jish Mahdi declared war on the U.S. military? Was it when Sadr City, home to ten percent of Iraq’s population, became a nightly battlefield for the Americans? Or was it when the insurgency began spreading from isolated pockets in the Sunni triangle to include most of Iraq? Despite President Bush’s rosy assessments, Iraq remains a disaster. If under Saddam it was a potential threat, under the Americans it has been transformed to imminent and active threat, a foreign policy failure bound to haunt the United States for decades to come. Iraqis like to call this mess the situation. ÊWhen asked how are things? they reply: the situation is very bad. What they mean by situation is this: the Iraqi government doesn’t control most Iraqi cities, there are several car bombs going off each day around the country killing and injuring scores of innocent people, the country’s roads are becoming impassable and littered by hundreds of landmines and explosive devices aimed to kill American soldiers, there are assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings. The situation, basically, means a raging barbaric guerilla war. In four days, 110 people died and over 300 got injured in Baghdad alone. The numbers are so shocking that the ministry of health, which was attempting an exercise of public transparency by releasing the numbers— has now stopped disclosing them. Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day. A friend drove thru the Shiite slum of Sadr City yesterday. He said young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices into the ground. They melt a shallow hole into the asphalt, dig the explosive, cover it with dirt and put an old tire or plastic can over it to signal to the locals this is booby-trapped. He said on the main roads of Sadr City, there were a dozen landmines per every ten yards. His car snaked and swirled to avoid driving over them. Behind the walls sits an angry Iraqi ready to detonate them as soon as an American convoy gets near. This is in Shiite land, the population that was supposed to love America for liberating Iraq. For journalists the significant turning point came with the wave of abduction and kidnappings. Only two weeks ago we felt safe around Baghdad because foreigners were being abducted on the roads and highways between towns. Then came a frantic phone call from a journalist female friend at 11 p.m. telling me two Italian women had been abducted from their homes in broad daylight. Then the two Americans, who got beheaded this week and the Brit, were abducted from their homes in a residential neighborhood. They were supplying the entire block with round the clock electricity from their generator to win friends. The abductors grabbed one of them at 6 a.m. when he came out to switch on the generator; his beheaded body was thrown back near the neighborhoods. The insurgency, we are told, is rampant with no signs of calming down. If any thing, it is growing stronger, organized and more sophisticated every day. The various elements within it — baathists, criminals, nationalists and Al Qaeda — are cooperating and coordinating. I went to an emergency meeting for foreign correspondents with the military and embassy to discuss the kidnappings. We were somberly told our fate would largely depend on where we were in the kidnapping chain once it was determined we were missing. ÊHere is how it goes: criminal gangs grab you and sell you up to Baathists in Fallujah, who will in turn sell you to Al Qaeda. In turn, cash and weapons flow the other way from Al Qaeda to the Baathisst to the criminals. My friend Georges, the French journalist snatched on the road to Najaf, has been missing for a month with no word on release or whether he is still alive. America’s last hope for a quick exit? The Iraqi police and National Guard units we are spending billions of dollars to train. The cops are being murdered by the dozens every dayÜover 700 to date — and the insurgents are infiltrating their ranks. The problem is so serious that the U.S. military has allocated $6 million dollars to buy out 30,000 cops they just trained to get rid of them quietly. As for reconstruction: firstly it’s so unsafe for foreigners to operate that almost all projects have come to a halt. After two years, of the $18 billion Congress appropriated for Iraq reconstruction only about $1 billion or so has been spent and a chuck has now been reallocated for improving security, a sign of just how bad things are going here. Oil dreams? Insurgents disrupt oil flow routinely as a result of sabotage and oil prices have hit record high of $49 a barrel. Who did this war exactly benefit? Was it worth it? Are we safer because Saddam is holed up and Al Qaeda is running around in Iraq? Iraqis say that thanks to America they got freedom in exchange for insecurity. Guess what? They say they’d take security over freedom any day, even if it means having a dictator ruler. I heard an educated Iraqi say today that if Saddam Hussein were allowed to run for elections he would get the majority of the vote. This is truly sad. Then I went to see an Iraqi scholar this week to talk to him about elections here. He has been trying to educate the public on the importance of voting. He said, “President Bush wanted to turn Iraq into a democracy that would be an example for the Middle East. Forget about democracy, forget about being a model for the region, we have to salvage Iraq before all is lost.” One could argue that Iraq is already lost beyond salvation. For those of us on the ground it’s hard to imagine what if any thing could salvage it from its violent downward spiral. The genie of terrorism, chaos and mayhem has been unleashed onto this country as a result of American mistakes and it can’t be put back into a bottle. The Iraqi government is talking about having elections in three months while half of the country remains a no go zone — out of the hands of the government and the Americans and out of reach of journalists. In the other half, the disenchanted population is too terrified to show up at polling stations. The Sunnis have already said they’d boycott elections, leaving the stage open for polarized government of Kurds and Shiites that will not be deemed as legitimate and will most certainly lead to civil war. I asked a 28-year-old engineer if he and his family would participate in the Iraqi elections since it was the first time Iraqis could to some degree elect a leadership. His response summed it all: “Go and vote and risk being blown into pieces or followed by the insurgents and murdered for cooperating with the Americans? For what? To practice democracy? Are you joking?”
<
p>(via Boing Boing)






6 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Wow - that’s really scary - forget Twilight Zone the Movie - this is Twilight Zone the Country. Let’s hope this gets read by anyone who would vote for Bush. We have truly upset the balance of nature with this madman running our country.
I’d say we get the government we deserve, but we don’t deserve this.
It is time USA & UK, represented by the beasts, Bush & Blair, are punished for the terror, deaths & devastation they have caused in Iraq & Afghanistan to further their own agenda. Till then the world will continue to see terrorists & mad despots like Bush & Blair cause untold suffering to the innocent men, women & children, smug in the knowledge that their military & economic power would protect them from punishment for their crimes against humanity. These are the two countries, which have created & sustained each & every major troublespot in the world after WW-II. Israel, Kashmir, The Arab Peninsula, Russia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bosnia, S. Africa & the entire North Africa have been bleeding because of these two demonic nations & continue to suffer in one form or the other.
Khalid-you speak with such hate and ugliness. You state that the “beasts (Bush and Blair) are punished for the terror, deaths and devastation they have caused….”. Where have you been? What about the 3000 killed on 9/11, the men and women killed on the USS COLE, and all of the ambassy bombings and killings…I could go on and on, but you, my “friend” are a lost cause. THAT WAS TERROR, this is retaliation/WAR! If we do not protect our people and teach the good Muslims around the world to defend themselves from these extremists, the world has NO future. By the way, where do YOU live? Possibly in the land of the FREE and HOME OF THE BRAVE-you don’t like our policies-try the freedom the Afghanis and Iraqis lived with before we were involved. A democratic society does not happen over night. Were you standing up for their freedoms when saddam was in charge? Do you think life would be better with osama? It is so easy to criticize. Try thinking out of the box for a change,; try to imagine the Middle East 50 years from now; it could be a beautiful world…or it could be the end of the world-have it your way?, I don’t think so.
Thanks V. Squires for waking these people up! The people of Iraq need to take responsibility for themselves and stop WHINING! The terrorists are few! The PEOPLE are many. For them to watch as “young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices into the ground” and DO NOTHING…maybe they should be left to their own devices. Why do Liberals think that a War can be PLANNED to the n-th degree? Kerry says he would have planned it better. Hello! Share your Intel, Sir, (since you know so much) so our Brave Soldiers don’t fall prey to gutless terrorists that have no problem killing their own children.
It’s true- the people are many. Anyd it’s the people of Iraq that are taking arms, not just a few foreigners, as President Cheney would have us believe. Of course the 9/11 attacks were a horrible act of terror, but, as has been shown many times, even just yesterday from the mouth of Rumsfeld himself, there is no conclusive evidence that Iraq was in any was associated with 9/11. So against whom are we retaliating? Mr. Hussein, while a despot and a dictator, was no immediate threat.
If you were in a country formerly run by a dictator, then some occupying force came along and ousted him, you’d say Yay, sure. But when that same force starts conducting air strikes on your neighborhood, when the soldiers of that force are told to shoot if someone even looks suspcious, would you still be saying Yay?
If you were a soldiier in that force and you went into a country to take out an evil leader, you’d say yay, sure. But when you’re there for twice as long as you should have been, when you’ve lost your job back home because you were gone too long so your family no longer has health benefits, when you’re under fire every day with inadequate equipment, when when the President signs an order to reduce your pay, while you see Blackwater ‘contractors’ (i.e. mercenaries) making 3 times as much as you for doing the same job, when you see any reconstruction efforts grind to a halt because the employees are afraid to leave their homes, would you still be saying yay?
It’s too bad Pres Bush Sr didn’t stand up for Iraqi freedoms when he was running Gulf War I; he financed 50,000 Iraqis to rise up against Hussein at the end of the conflict, but then abandoned them because he was too busy taking care of trying to get re-elected. Those 50,000 uprisers we all killed.
Sure, Hussein was a tyrant who ‘gasses his own people’ (i.e. the Kurds, who weren’t his own people; they; like the Palestinians, are trying to form their own state in northern Iraq)- he gassed them with weapons that the U.S. sold him 5 years earlier. And 12 days after he did it, a representative of the U.S. went over to Iraq, shook Hussein’s hand and said thanks for fighting Iran for us. And we thanked him again by selling Iran missles in exchange for funds to give to the Contras in Central America (remember Ollie North?), which prolonged the Iran/Iraq war and cost thousands of lives.
V Squires, you said that it’s easy to criticize— you’ve certainly proved the point. Perhaps you and your friend Mr. Chin should do a little reading before you make a final assessment.
Question:
Has 9/11 become just a selling point, now?
Am I supposed to re-elect (or: re-reject) Bush because of 9/11?
9/11-9/11-9/11….it’s like a Republican broken record.
C’mon, people: If 9/11 was REALLY that important to Bush, we would still be hard at it in Afghanistan, and severing ties with the Saudis, until they rid themselves of ALL monetary funding to cell groups around the world out to do really bad things to us infidels…….
Don’t kid yourselves. Know the difference between marketing, and the facts.
IRAQ POSES, AND HAS NOT POSED, ANY THREAT TO THE USA IN OVER A DECADE.
NO WMDs in Iraq.
NO STOCKPILES in Iraq.
NO RADIOACTIVE PROGRAMS in Iraq.
End of story.