Repercussions
Politics 10/21/2004 |You may remember that a couple weeks ago, Bush’s hometown paper The Iconoclast endorsed John Kerry for President.
Reaction to their endorsement has been strong — to the point where they wrote a second editorial, detaling some of that reaction. It’s not a pretty picture.
We expected that perhaps a few readers might cancel subscriptions, and maybe even ads, but have been amazed at a few of the more intense communications, some of which bordered on outright personal attacks and uncalled-for harassment.
We have been told by several avid Bush supporters that the days when newspapers publish editorials without personal repercussions are over. […] The new mode of operation, I am told, is that when a newspaper prints an editorial of which some sectors might disagree, the focus is now upon how to run the newspaper out of business. Out the window are the contributions the newspaper has made to the community in the past and the newspaper’s extensive investment in the community. We do understand peoples’ rights to pull subscriptions and ads, and to express a differing opinion, but we have some trouble understanding threats and payback since in politics there are often a variety of options. For the publishers to herald one of the options should be no cause for persecution. […] Unfortunately, for the Iconoclast and its publishers there have been threats — big ones including physical harm. [&hellip] Several young members of our staff covering Tonkawa Traditions this past weekend were angrily harassed and threatened that they must leave, which cut short their ability to fully do their jobs and instilled in them considerable fear for their safety. These reporters had nothing to do with that editorial. They were part-time college students working to pay their way through school and better themselves. Although several members of the community are upset at the newspaper, there are still those who want us to continue with local coverage as we have in the past. We do have concern for the safety of our staff, however, and find it troubling when they are bullied and cannot do their jobs.
<
p>”The days when newspapers publish editorials without personal repercussions are over?” What kind of bullheaded, stupid insanity is this?
So truly sad.
(via MeFi)
[See also: Losing a voice | Bush’s hometown paper endorses Kerry | Pro-US, anti-Bush | Gene Robinson under FBI guard | Driving sounds better all the time ]
« Well, bummer | Mad World »
5 Responses to “Repercussions”
Leave a Reply






October 21st, 2004 at 12:05 pm
Newspapers shouldn’t be endorsing anyone in the first place. Their job is to report news not tell us who they want to win the election.
October 21st, 2004 at 12:37 pm
<paranoia hat> The worst part is how many US citizens there are who don’t see any problem with these tactics. These are the same people who don’t understand the necessity of a rigorous separation of church and state, don’t see why removing people from a rally because of something on their T-shirt is bad, and are unable to model/extrapolate what the world would be like if the underlying rights that these consequences are based on are eroded in this way. </paranoia hat>
magistyk: There is a long tradition of editorializing by newspapers. That’s why it’s called “editorializing”. While most of a paper is intended to be relatively objective, the editorial page is a great example of what free speech is supposed to be about in this country: the free exchange of ideas. While individual news professionals often refrain from even participating in politics entirely (Jim Lehrer doesn’t even vote), the editorial staff have a different kind of role.
October 21st, 2004 at 4:11 pm
Ok EVERY media outlet has an opinion and unfortunatly not all of them are open about it.
As Royce said, newpapers have always had editorials and always will and should always carry them. This is not bad this is good, it is part of the public debate.
What is bad is when editorial/opinion pieces are not marked as such and are therefore presented as NEWS.
I am scared with the way the US is going, I am scared with the way Australia (my country) is going.
October 21st, 2004 at 7:42 pm
And if you think things are bad now, don’t even bother imagining what they’ll be like if Bush wins this election. Just start your four-year-around -the-world trip in November or apply for Canadian citizenship. You won’t want to live in this country if Bush wins - it’ll be a return to the days of the House Un-American Activities Committee and Sen. McCarthy.
October 25th, 2004 at 2:38 pm
As a longtime writer/editor — it would be ridiculous to say that newspapers shouldn’t endorse a presidential candidate. Newspapers are (supposed) to be a reflection of the people’s voice - from commentary to political comic strips, and silencing them would put their already fragile line between news/corporation further down the cold end of that spectrum.
This town is an ironic symbol of the current state of affairs — the Bush administration bullies it’s opposition, whatever the cause, in clearly the same fashion. A reason why cowboys are just cowboys and not the leaders of the free world. I look forward to a time again when I can hear a president drum up an intelligient comment with depth and theme, not this empty optimism. Maybe he should have spent more time reading books, instead of running companies to the ground.