Five Senators Join the Fight to Learn Just How Bad Ring Really Is: “…if police want to request footage from a person’s front door in reference to a car break-in on that street, there is no need for police to verify that footage would be helpful to solving that incident, or whether the footage would even be used for that particular incident and not for other purposes. If a person agrees to share their footage with police, police then have that footage forever and can share it with whoever they want without oversight or restrictions. This means footage from your door, requested by local police to catch an alleged thief in the neighborhood, could end up being used by another law enforcement agency for a completely attenuated purpose, such as identifying someone for deportation—without your knowledge or direct consent.”
Apple sleuths hunt Northwest for varieties believed extinct: “E.J. Brandt and David Benscoter, who together form the nonprofit Lost Apple Project, log countless hours and hundreds of miles in trucks, on all-terrain vehicles and on foot to find orchards planted by settlers as they pushed west more than a century ago.”
Another good online time-waster: a version of Breakout that actually manages to put a new twist on the game by giving it a circular playfield — Plastic Balls.
Rather than running your paddle back and forth across a plane…well, you know those bright yellow plastic funnel coin collectors where you drop a coin down a trough and watch it go spinning in circles down the funnel? Put bricks around the outside edge of the funnel, put your paddle rotating around the funnel, and let the ball bounce between your paddle in the center and the bricks on the outside.
Very cool, and the extra level of pseudo-dimensionality adds a nice new touch to the gameplay.
(via Collision Detection)
Two years ago, in a rather ridiculous display of small-minded stupidity, the town of Blue Springs, MO earmarked \$273,000 of their education budget to combat Goth culture.
“Goth culture” in Blue Springs, Mo., may be in for some tough times.
Thanks to Rep. Sam Graves, a Republican who represents the Kansas City suburb, \$273,000 out of the Department of Education’s fiscal 2002 budget will help the Blue Springs Outreach Unit take on a perceived problem for local youths.
“It is my hope that this funding will give the officers in the Youth Outreach Unit the tools they need to identify Goth culture leaders that are preying on our kids,” Rep. Graves said in a press release announcing the appropriation last month.
“It was really a community need, and they really weren’t able to satisfactorily get money at the local level,” Mr. Patek said of the Blue Springs project to combat Goth culture. Some parents and law- enforcement officials are concerned that, beyond the dark fashions and music characteristic of that subculture, some “Goth” teenagers are drawn into potentially dangerous behavior.
The program is meant to help train police officers, and help schools and families with children involved in Goth culture, according to the announcement from Rep. Graves. Drug abuse and self-mutilation are among the troubling behaviors Goth culture fosters, Mr. Patek said.
He stressed that the effort will not be limited to Blue Springs. “I know this was a good project,” Mr. Patek said. “And it’s a finite amount of resources. … We’re not talking about an ongoing federal commitment.”
This was so unnecessary. We must protect our children from those evil people who wear black, and listen to all that wierd music! Ugh.
Thankfully, word comes now that the project essentially went nowhere, and more than half of the money is being returned (and, hopefully, put to better use in the future). The best part? Rather than “combatting” Goth culture, the people involved ended up realizing that it’s not such a horrible thing, and just another aspect of how some people choose to present themselves.
The Goth grant is over.
Goth acceptance and tolerance is now in.
…plans for the grant never unfolded, and Blue Springs has returned \$132,000 of the money unused. Officials concede today they never found much of a “problem” at all associated with the Goth culture, and instead have developed a new understanding and acceptance.
A little good news to start the day, for once.
Apparently, the new library has been getting a ton of press as of late. A mention on MetaFilter led me to quite a few different links:
- The Seattle P-I: Special section on the new library.
- The Seattle Times: Special section on the new library.
- Slate: Koolhaas the Librarian – Critic’s won’t keep quiet about the Seattle Public Library. “Rem Koolhaas, the Stones to Frank Gehry’s Beatles, finally surpasses his rival in star-chitecture. The Californian’s MIT Center got mixed reviews recently, but the Dutchman’s new library earns florid, Bilbao-like superlatives, confirming that architecture criticism is still in its Baroque period.”
- The New Yorker: High-Tech Bibliophilia. “The [building] is the most important new library to be built in a generation, and the most exhilarating.”
- The New York Times: The Library That Puts on Fishnets and Hits the Disco. “In more than 30 years of writing about architecture, this is the most exciting new building it has been my honor to review. I could go on piling up superlatives like cars in a multiple collision, but take my word: there’s going to be a whole lot of rubbernecking going on.”
- Pacific Northwest: Meet your New Central Library. “Somehow this glass box conveys not coldness but intimacy. The result is not just a library, but a community hub and global showplace that transcends its own city block between Madison and Spring streets. It reaches out and melds with the downtown towers around it.”
I am so there for the grand opening on Sunday.
iTunes: “Cabaret (from Cabaret)” by Haworth, Jill from the album Broadway: The Great Original Cast Recordings (1966, 4:31).
Those of you who’ve read this site for a while may know that I have something of a fascination for conspiracy theories. Sometimes they interest me because they’re so patently ludicrous, sometimes because they’re convincing enough to be nearly frightenting, and sometimes they end up somewhere in between.
I’m not really sure where to classify this one: Nick Berg’s Killing: 50 Fishy Circumstances, Contradictory Claims, and Videotape Anomalies.
Some of the points below are compelling. Some are weak or may turn out to be insignificant or coincidental. This is a work in progress, an early overview of discrepancies. There are too many discrepancies and contradictions to dismiss doubts about the video and the official U.S. stories about Berg. Additional inquiry and fact checking are needed as the Berg story unfolds or, rather, unravels.
Please keep in mind that I’m not posting this because I agree or disagree — rather, I’m posting it because I think it’s of interest. Many of the comments in the accompanying discussion thread are at least worth skimming, too. Some are far more vitriolic than strictly necessary (not really a surprise, of course, given the scope of the article), but a few do a good job of addressing some of the questions raised in the article itself.
The subject matter being what it is, of course, many of the points raised may not be for the squeamish.
(via Boing Boing)
Slashdot recently posted a link to this fascinating (in a geeky sort of way) rundown of the Imperial (Metric) system and how it relates to paper sizing. Some of what followed in the discussion thread I knew, some I didn’t, but it was one of the more interesting threads I’ve read on /. in a while.
Having worked in the quick-print industry for something over a decade now, while I don’t normally deal with metric paper sizes, I’ve gotten very used to thinking in metric when setting jobs up. This is simply because the machines I was working with for quite a few years — the Xerox Docutech family — could be set to work in either inches or millimeters. No matter which base measurement you chose, though, you could then nudge an image by a tenth of your base measurement. Obviously, you had much finer control when attempting to align items if you could nudge by a tenth of a millimeter rather than a tenth of an inch, so setting the machines to millimeters became fairly standard practice for me.
Still, it’s obvious when doing this that the two systems don’t really work together very well. US Letter size paper is commonly noted as 216mm by 279mm, and US Ledger (11″x17″) is 279mm by 432mm, however, each of these are actually approximations, and off by a few tenths of a millimeter on each side. Still, kludgy or not, the benefits gained through the finer control was worth it.
After reading through the discussion, though, I really wish the US would finally switch over to metric.
Things I knew:
From the original post:
For those who enjoy a bit of math, did you know that in the Metric paper system, the height-to-width ratio of all pages is the square root of 2? This means that you can place two sheets of A4 side-by-side and they will equal an A3 sheet exactly, and two sheets of A3 will equal an A2.
On trying to enlarge or reduce between paper sizes (which never works well with US paper sizes), from SSpade:
11×17 is not the same shape as 8 1/2×11.
That’s the real beauty of A4/A3 etc. All the sizes in a given series (A00, A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5… or B1, B2, B3…) are the same shape.
So you can photocopy an A4 document onto A3 paper expanding it by the right proportion and it’ll fit perfectly. And you can copy two A4 documents onto A3 paper and it’ll fit perfectly. Or use psnup to put A4 formatted documents reduced to 2-up on A4 paper with no wasted space.
Try that with letter or legal size….
Things I learned:
On bra sizing, from ZeLonewolf:
The number is the measurement below the bust.
An A-cup is a 1-inch difference between the measurement below the bust versus around the bust. B-cup is 2 inches, C-cup is 3 inches, etc. DD is the same as E, DDD is the same as EE which is the same as F. This holds valid through an H cup. After that, the interval is 2 inches, with the doubled letter being the in-between value. Thus, H-cup is 8″, and I-cup is 10″, and a 9\” difference would be an HH-cup.
The largest bra size manufactured without a special order is a size 60N.
On the origin of “one for the road” and “on the wagon”, from Sirch:
Not quite. The saying actually refers to the trip from the prison to the Tyburn Tree in London. The prisoner to be hanged would be given drink to calm him down for the hanging. The closest pub to the place of hanging that lay upon the route was a mile away. The prisoner would have a drink at this last pub, and then be given a drink to have on his way to the gallows. Interestingly, this is also the origin of “on the wagon” as one of the guards travelling with the prisoner was not allowed to enter the pubs with him. So couldn’t drink, and had to stay on the wagon.
That’s not quite true – one of the reasons that the Imperial system is moderately convenient for building is that base 12 is divisible by 2,3,4 and 6, so you’ll encounter less rounding error if you need to split things up into common numbers. Base 10 is only divisible by 2 and 5. (Incidentally, this is of course why one of the older civilizations used base 60 – it’s divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, and it’s the reason we have 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour).
So, for instance, if you want to break a 1′ object into thirds, you can do it exactly. Try doing it with meters – it’s 33 and a third centimeters. Most people would say “screw it, it’s 333 mm” – but if you now take those “1/3 m” sticks and put 300 of them end to end, you don’t have 100 m – you have 99.9 m, and you’re a full ten centimeters short. In imperial, 1/3 of a yard is 1 foot. No rounding errors.
There really are advantages to the Imperial system – most people, however, simply assume that Imperial sucks and leave it at that.
I would have infinitely greater respect for the Imperial system if all of it did indeed work in twelves, like with feet and inches. But inches are not divided into twelfths but sixteenths. Then there are three feet in a yard, 5.5 yards in a rod, 40 rods in a furlong, 8 furlongs (or a nice round 1760 yards) in a mile. 16 ounces in a pound, 14 pounds in a stone, 2000 pounds in a ton. Don’t get me started on liquid measure. And ultimately, you have to measure so closely that you have to use decimal places of the smallest unit (like 11.6 inches or whatever) – which means tens all round.
Remind me again what makes it easier to use?
Just go with tens. Tens are simple.
I’m an architest and I can tell you that the Imperial system sucks big time and is not convenient at all.
Adding up Imperial measurements is a freaking nightmare.
In the rest of the world we use standard sizes for construction materials like 150x150mm wall tiles, 300×300 floor tiles, 600×600 raised floor tiles, 900×900 carpet tiles, 1200×2400 (or higher) gypsum wall panels…. get it – it’s all on a sensible module that you can use to line everything up on …. AND it doesn’t stop you from use the exact same convenient divisor of base 12. In fact the above building material sizes show this exactly.
And you can easily add them all up.
The other thing that no one has mentioned is scale and the A system.
The majority of drawings we make are A1 sizes – which nicely scales to A3. A 1:50 drawing at A1 becomes a 1:100 scale at A3 – not the freaking ridiculous Imperial scales.
Then you can get a ruler with a 1cm scale on it and every cm is a metre.
Note that if you scale a A3 to A4 then everything becomes an inconvenient scale. What happens is that you reduce A3 to A4 for a Fax transmission the receiver scales it back up to A3 to use.
Note that the same issue occurs with A1 to A2 or A2 to A3. You need to scale down two levels in the A system to maintain scale – which is fine for most uses.
So the Imperial system sucks in all ways for Architects and construction in general.
On scaling in-progress engineering drawings, from the linked article, pointed out by Momomoto:
Technical drawing pens follow the same size-ratio principle. The standard sizes differ by a factor sqrt(2): 2.00 mm, 1.40 mm, 1.00 mm, 0.70 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.35 mm, 0.25 mm, 0.18 mm, 0.13 mm. So after drawing with a 0.35 mm pen on A3 paper and reducing it to A4, you can continue with the 0.25 mm pen. (ISO 9175-1)
Things I laughed at:
On good uses for US size paper, from ajs:
Also, if you take 3 8.5×11 sheets, line them up along their longer sides, attach them to eachother, put a staple through the middle of the first and second sheet join and then hang them from a height of approximately eye-level it makes the idea place for a picture of a naked “girl next door”.
My buddy Heff taught me that trick.
There’s also an Audi A4, and if you put two of those side by side, people say “Look, isn’t that a coincidence”.
Two Mini Coopers side by side == One Audi A4 Two Audis == One BAM (“Big Assed Mercedes”) Two Mercedes == One average European house.
Wow, those Europeans can apply simple metric system math to everything!
Meanwhile, in America: Two Mini Coopers side by side == One speed bump for a Hummer H2. Two Audis in the driveway == A good house to break into. Two Mercedes == Really, really tacky. Two Hummers == The energy consumption of a typical third-world country Two third world countries == A re-unified Germany. (I keed!)
On the real reason why the US will never switch, from forrestt:
Actually, it has to do with apple pie. Since there is nothing more American than apple pie, the apple pie recipe is considered sacred. It has been passed down from generation to generation since the start of this glorious nation. Unfortunatly, it has been passed down on the female side of our ancestry, and we men have been telling our women that:
|——| = 10 inches, when in fact |———| = 10 inches.
This has caused them to become totally confused with regard to units of measure, and they are thus unable to convert imperial to metric units. Thus, if we were to switch to using the metric system, we would no longer be able to bake apple pies, a situation we are just not willing to accept.
On Japanese influence over metric paper sizing, from revery:
And of course, 5 sheets of almost any metric sized paper folded into origami lions will inevitably merge to form Voltron, a robot so powerful that it will usually let it’s enemies kick it’s butt around for a good 15 to 20 minutes before it forms the blazing sword and finishes the fight.
I’ve mentioned Something Positive a time or two in the past, but in case you’ve missed it, it’s a great little web comic. Highly recommended. So when I stumbled across this quiz tonight, I had to take it…
iTunes: “Of Time and Rivers Flowing” by Havens, Richie from the album Where Have All the Flowers Gone: The Songs of Pete Seeger (1997, 2:30).
While I’m sure that a benefit run to support the Seattle Animal Shelter is a very good cause, when we’re living in an era with some rather well-known odd kinks, maybe naming it the “Furry 5K” wasn’t the best choice in the world…
At least I wasn’t the only one to have that thought!
iTunes: “Mister Superstar” by Marilyn Manson from the album Antichrist Superstar (1996, 5:04).
This could be an entertaining way to spend some time this weekend — the annual U-District Street Fair.
For 35 years the University District StreetFair has been the kick-off event for the festival season in the Seattle region. Attracting more than 50,000 people and nearly 400 booths to the District, the StreetFair is an energetic and exciting celebration of arts and crafts, community, music, and food. You’ll find a whirl of color, craft, creativity and downright craziness! Join the thousands of people who attend. There will be two entertainment stages, and unique local and regional arts & crafts and an array of international food. The StreetFair is a free event, located in the heart of the University District on University Way NE, and is produced by the Greater University Chamber of Commerce.
Sounds like a good opportunity to grab the camera and go wander off people watching for a few hours.
(via LJ Seattle)
iTunes: “Atomic Dog” by Wreck, The from the album Black Box (1991, 4:03).